studies

Lee (1988). Distribution of Practice in Motor Skill Acquisition: Learning and Performance Effects Reconsidered.

Table of Contents

Full Citation

Lee, T. D. & Genovese, E. D. (1988). Distribution of Practice in Motor Skill Acquisition: Learning and Performance Effects Reconsidered. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 59(4), 277–287.

Abstract

Recent reviews about the effects of distribution of practice in motor learning have produced quite divergent conclusions. While there is agreement that massed practice depresses performance, the effect on learning has no firm consensus. One position is that massed practice depresses learning, although there are many that argue for no learning effect. In the present paper we review this literature. When distribution is considered in terms of the length of the inter-trial interval, there is strong evidence that massed practice depresses performance and learning (when learning is assessed by absolute retention measures). This conclusion was confirmed by the results of a meta-analysis. This finding is discussed relative to other literature on distribution of practice as well as some recent issues in motor learning.

Key Results

Result Name Effect Size Reliability
Spaced Practice vs. Massed Practice (Performance)
Large
Large
Medium
Medium
Spaced Practice vs. Massed Practice (Learning)
Locked Become a Member
Locked Become a Member
Locked Become a Member

Study Characteristics

Learning Domain Motor Learning
Study Topic Massed Practice, Spaced Practice
Study Type
Membership Required
Task Studied
Membership Required
Subject Type
Membership Required
Number of Studies
Membership Required
Quality Score (%)*
Membership Required

* Study quality assessed using JBI Systematic Review Checklist.

Reviewer Notes

This was a fairly influential study about spaced (distributed) practice versus massed practice for motor learning. It’s a meta-analysis of 116 studies (but only 47 were included in the analysis), and was made more valuable given the differentiation between performance and learning effects. However, this study lacks a lot of detail that would have made it much more useful.

Nulla gravida orci a odio. Nullam varius, turpis et commodo pharetra, est eros bibendum elit, nec luctus magna felis sollicitudin mauris. Integer in mauris eu nibh euismod gravida. Maecenas fermentum consequat mi. Cras mollis scelerisque nunc.

Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Nulla vitae mauris non felis mollis faucibus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Duis ac tellus et risus vulputate vehicula. Aliquam faucibus, elit ut dictum aliquet, felis nisl adipiscing sapien, sed malesuada diam lacus eget erat. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.